TLS Offshore Containers, TLS Special Containers
  • Home
    • About us
    • Quality, Health, Safety and Environment
    • Manufacturing standards
    • Container certificates
  • Containerised solutions
    • Intelligent pressurised container | MUD logging cabin
    • Battery energy storage system (BESS) container
    • Laboratory container | workshop container | Equipment containers
    • Temporary refuge shelter | Toxic gas refuge | Safe haven
    • Offshore accommodation cabin | office container
    • Reefer container | Refrigerated container
    • Intelligent waste water treatment container
    • Fresh water generator container
  • Cargo Containers
    • Offshore closed containers
    • Half height container
    • Cargo basket
    • Cutting skip, waste skip
    • Drum basket
    • Offshore Tank
    • Mini container
    • Open top container
  • Product photos & videos
  • News & Blogs
  • Contact us

TLS news & blogs

DNV Certification for Offshore Containers

12/5/2022

 
As defined by the International Maritime Organization, an offshore container is a "portable unit specially designed for repeated use in the transport of goods or equipment between fixed and/or floating offshore installations and ships. Known in the offshore oil and gas community as "slippery rails "as they are often used to transport large assemblies to drilling and production rigs.
DNV's certification standards 2.7-1, 2 and 3 are a globally recognized set of certification standards for offshore containers and marine service modules. ​The certification standards relate to the certification of all types of marine containers as transport units. The three typical stages of transportation are: shore-based residency (eg, forklifts), supply vessels, and loading and unloading offshore facilities. The certification standards include design requirements related to all three phases.
There are five basic steps for DNV approval and certification:
1. Certification of our (or our client's designation) written welding procedures, laboratory tests and welder qualifications
2. Evaluate and approve our primary device/skid/frame designs
3. Audit/Survey during initial welding start-up
4. Production:Audits/investigations during equipment manufacturing
5. Prototype testing:For "type" approval (type approval means a series of identical units are manufactured over a period)
offshore shipping container

DNV2.7-1 or DNV2.7-3?  How to choose?

6/2/2022

 
What is DNV certification?
DNV (Det Norske Veritas), a Norwegian classification society, merged with Germanischer Lloyd (GL) in September 2013 to form the world's largest classification society DNV GL Group.
 As a classification society, DNV GL sets standards for the offshore, maritime, energy and oil and gas industries. The purpose of these standards is to provide users, operators and engineers with requirements, principles and acceptance criteria.

Two common standards are:
  • DNVGL-ST-E271, Offshore containers (2.7-1)
  • DNVGL-ST-E273, Portable offshore containers (2.7-3)
 
DNV2.7-1 and DNV2.7-3 in common
  • Both 2.7-1 and 2.7-3 are standards specify requirements and recommended practice covering transport of offshore containers and portable offshore containers.
  • The standards cover the specific areas of design, manufacturing, testing, certification, and periodic inspection
  • Both standards cover the lifting frames or containers and, in most cases, not the equipment contained within the frames
  • Both standards cover the safe lifting and handling of offshore containers and installations between two floating vessels and between vessels and fixed or floating offshore installations.
 
Difference between DNV2.7-1 and DNV2.7-3
Apart from the difference in standard details, the biggest difference is that the maximum gross weight (MGW) of dnV2.7-1 certified container is less than 25,000 kgs, and the MGW of DNV2.7-3 certified container is greater than 25,000 kgs.
 
Although DNV2.7-1 and DNV2.7-3 standards are set by DNV Classification Society, they are also recognized by other classification societies (BV, LRs, etc), which will issue corresponding certificates according to the same standards.
Picture

In cooperation with on-site inspections from end customers

4/13/2022

 
The specially designed ultra-wide explosion-proof lab container|workshop container| Pressure container is about to be delivered. Our technicians are cooperating with various inspections from the end customer and SGS to ensure that the performance of the container meets customer standards and industry standards.
TLS provides DNV2.7-1 standard | explosion-proof | which can be used in hazardous areas (ZONE 0, ZONE 1, AND ZONE 2) | special containers that meet A60 fire rating, we provide the independent certification from DNV | BV | LR | ABS | SGS.

​Any requirements, please contact us directly:
E-mail: sales@tls-containers.com 
Hotline: +65-65637288; +65-31386967
airlock is being inspected tls
cpfg testing explosion proof pressure container
the end customer is inspecting the positive pressure explosion proof box
test lab container inspection before shipping
laboratory container cleaning area zone 0 zone 1 zone 2
extra wide pressure container tls offshore
external container inspection tls
bv-lr-sgs-certificate-tls-offshore
Key words:
#DNV  #BV  #LR    #ABS  #SGS  #DNV2.7-1  #ESS  #BESS   #A60 fire rating  #explosion-proof  #LAB # workshop container  #TLS offshore containers



WHAT BASIC TESTS WILL THE FACTORY DO BEFORE THE CONTAINER DELIVERY?

1/21/2022

 

1 WELDING INSPECTION
Welding inspection of containers, including inspection and NDT.
The whole inspection process runs through the manufacturing process of containers, not limited to the final product, and adjusts production at any time to ensure welding quality.
 
2 LIFTING TEST
In addition to the test required by international container safety convention, our company will also carry out a two-point and four-point lifting test.
The two-point lifting test mainly tests the anti-deformation ability of containers at sea under extreme conditions, and the four-point lifting test mainly tests the carrying capacity of containers at sea. Both tests do not allow permanent deformation of containers at sea during accelerated crane lifting.
 
3 DROP TEST
The main purpose of the drop test is to examine the impact of the lifting and placing of containers at sea to ensure that the cabinet can withstand the damage caused by the impact.
 
4. WATER TIGHTNESS TEST
The container body is sprayed with high-pressure water from all directions, and will be checked in all directions after spraying to ensure that there is no water in it.

WATER TIGHTNESS TEST
WATER TIGHTNESS TEST for shipping container
LIFTING TEST

HOW TO CHOOSE A CONTAINER ACCOMMODATION|BESS BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE|MODULAR OFFICE| ATEX CONTAINER|WORKSHOP CONTAINER|CONTAINER LAB WHICH IS SUITABLE FOR YOUR PROJECT?

10/27/2021

 
"ONSHORE ISO SHIPPING CONTAINERS" VS "OFFSHORE DNV SHIPPING CONTAINERS"
  •  EXPOSURE TO HARSH ENVIRONMENTS
  • Offshore containers are often left exposed to open sea on the decks of supply vessels, and also loaded to platforms in harsh weather conditions, this also means that the minimum design temperature is normally specified as -20° C and the primary structure requires material of sufficient toughness for -20° C.
  •  LOADING AND UNLOADING FORCES
  • Because many offshore containers cannot be used with typical lifting equipment such as spreader beams, the methods of loading and unloading put different types of pressure on the structures of offshore containers. Offshore containers are supplied with a permanently installed sling set. Most do not have corner castings, and if they do, they are not allowed to be lifted from them.
  •  NON-STANDARD DESIGNS
  • Most offshore containers are built to fit a specific piece of equipment, and therefore, do not fit into the ISO container category.

DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS AREAS HAVE A CERTAIN IMPACT ON THE DESIGN OF CONTAINERS, BUT HOW TO IDENTIFY ZONE 0, ZONE 1, AND ZONE 2 HAZARDOUS AREAS?
  • Zone 0: the area where explosive gases persist for a long time or will occur frequently.
  • Zone 1: the area where an explosive atmosphere may occasionally occur during normal operation. It may exist as a result of repair, maintenance operations, or leaks.
  • Zone 2: the place where an explosive atmosphere is unlikely to occur during normal operations, but if it does, it will only last for a short time. These areas become dangerous only in the event of an accident or some unusual operating conditions.
zone1 ZONE2 ZONE0

ABS gulidline for PORTABLE ACCOMMODATION MODULES, American Bureau of Shipping, Guildline updated in FEBRUARY 2020

1/28/2021

 
ABS guildline for portable offshore accommodation modules

The installation of modular buildings for use as living quarters, industrial spaces, and workshops has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Irrespective of the amount of time that portable modules are installed onboard, the potential risks to personnel within these buildings can be comparable to those within a traditional living quarters structure.
Due to the transient nature of portable accommodation modules, it is possible that the buildings may be installed on a number of different types of vessels and offshore units over their life. In recognizing that the ABS class requirements differ based on the type of host vessel or facility, this Guide has been created to outline the process for the design and survey of the modules and to establish the requirements for modules which can be used on any category of offshore drilling unit, production facility, barge, steel vessel, or high speed craft.

Class Approval Process
The ABS approval process for accommodation modules is a four-step process as outlined below:
• Design Review of the Module 
• Survey of the Module at Fabrication Facility
• Design Review for Installation Approval 
• Survey onboard Host Vessel 

The ABS review process of the module commences with drawings and documentation detailing the module’s general arrangements, structural fire protection, electrical configuration, structural design, and machinery and piping systems being submitted to the ABS technical office for review. Upon completion of the review, drawings will be returned to the submitter and forwarded to the attending ABS Surveyor. Receipt of the drawings by the ABS Surveyor permits the physical survey of the module at the fabrication facility to be commenced.
Once a host vessel for the module is determined, design review for installation approval can be commenced. Upon receipt of the documentation detailing the module and the proposed location onboard the host vessel, the ABS technical office can review the arrangements. Once the ABS engineers have determined that the proposed location onboard the host vessel is suitable for the subject module, stamped drawings will be returned to the submitter and made available to the attending ABS Survey office. Upon receipt of these drawings, the attending ABS Surveyor may attend the vessel and confirm that the installation of the modules is in accordance with the approved arrangements.
The manufacturer is to assign a unique serial number to identify all modules being reviewed to this Guide. The initial submission of drawings is to specifically indicate the serial number of modules to be built in accordance with the drawings.

Please download TLS accommodation modular brochure , TLS ABS approved offshore accommodation module brochure for reference. 

​More information about accommodation modulars, offshore accommodation cabins, gallery module, mess module, etc.
Please contact sales@tls-containers.com for more information. 

ABS
ABS

32FT offshore accommodation modules, 8 pax accommodation cabin, ABS approved offshore cabin
32FT offshore accommodation modules, 8 pax accommodation cabin, ABS approved offshore cabin

IEC 60079-13 Ed. 2.0 en:2017, Iecex system, hazardous zone classification

9/5/2020

 
In electrical and safety engineering, hazardous locations are places where fire or explosion hazards may exist. Sources of such hazards include gases, vapors, dust, fibers, and flyings, which are combustible or flammable. Electrical equipment installed in such locations could provide an ignition source, due to electrical arcing, or high temperature. Standards and regulations exist to identify such locations, classify the hazards, and design equipment for safe use in such locations.
A light switch may cause a small, harmless spark when switched on or off. In an ordinary household this is of no concern, but if a flammable atmosphere is present, the arc might start an explosion. In many industrial, commercial, and scientific settings, the presence of such an atmosphere is a common, or at least commonly possible, occurrence.
Equipment can be designed or modified for safe operation in hazardous locations. The two general approaches are:
1. Intrinsic safety
Intrinsic safety, also called non-incendive, limits the energy present in a system, such that it is insufficient to ignite a hazardous atmosphere under any conditions. This includes low both power levels, and low stored energy. Common with instrumentation.
2. Explosion proof
Explosion-proof or flame-proof equipment is sealed and rugged, such that it will not ignite a hazardous atmosphere, despite any despite sparks or explosion within. 
Several techniques of flame-proofing exist, and they are often used in combination:
  • The equipment housing may be sealed to prevent entry of flammable gas or dust into the interior.
  • The housing may be strong enough to contain and cool any combustion gases produced internally.
  • Enclosures can be pressurized with clean air or inert gas, displacing any hazardous substance.
  • Arc-producing elements can be isolated from the atmosphere, by encapsulation in resin, immersion in oil, or similar.
  • Heat-producing elements can be designed to limit their maximum temperature below the autoignition temperature of the material involved.
  • Controls can be fitted to detect dangerous concentrations of hazardous gas, or failure of countermeasures. Upon detection, appropriate action is automatically taken, such as removing power, or providing notification.
Here we focus on the enclosure method in TLS to keep the electrical equipment inside. TLS designs and manufactures the containerised solutions with intelligent control system, hazardous gas detecting system, fire & gas system following IEC 60079-13 standards. 
IEC 60079-13 ED. 2.0 EN:2017
Explosive Atmospheres - Part 13: Equipment Protection By Pressurized Room "P" And Artificially Ventilated Room "V" IEC 60079-13:2017(E) gives requirements for the design, construction, assessment, verification and marking of rooms used to protect internal equipment by pressurization or artificial ventilation or both as applicable when located in an explosive gas atmosphere or combustible dust atmosphere hazardous area with or without an internal source of a flammable gas or vapour. It also includes a room located in a non-hazardous area that has an internal source of release of a flammable gas or vapour. This document deals with rooms that are partially constructed in a manufacturer’s facility and intended to have the final installation completed on-site, as well as rooms that are constructed completely on-site. Rooms partially constructed in a manufacturer’s facility may include third-party verification. For rooms built on-site, this document can be used by plant operators as a guide for assessment of those facilities. This document represents a major technical revision of the requirements for equipment protection by pressurized room "p" and artificially ventilated room "v" and should be considered as introducing all new requirements. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2010. This edition constitutes a technical revision.  This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition:
 - modification of the title of this document to include artificially ventilated room "v" in addition to pressurized room "p";
 - addition of types of protection "pb", "pc", and "vc" and removal of types of protection "px", "py", "pz" and "pv";
 - definition of the differences between pressurization and artificial ventilation types of protection;
 - removal of protection of rooms with an inert gas or a flammable gas from the scope of this document;
 - addition of an informative annex to include examples of applications where types of protection pressurization or artificial ventilation or pressurization and artificial ventilation can be used and associated guidelines. 

Keywords: marking of rooms used to protect internal equipment, pressurized room “p”, artificially ventilated room “v”
IECEx System Objective
The objective of the IECEx System is to facilitate international trade in equipment and services for use in explosive atmospheres. while maintaining the required level of safety:
, reduced testing and certification costs to manufacturer
, reduced time to market
, international confidence in the product assessment process
, one international database listing
, maintaining International Confidence in equipment and services covered by IECEx Certification
 
What is an Ex area?
Ex areas can be known by different names such as "Hazardous Locations·. "Hazardous Areas· "Explosive Atmospheres·. and the like and relate to areas where flammable liquids, vapors, gases or combustible dusts are likely to occur in quantities sufficient to cause a fire or explosion.
The modern day automation of industry has meant an increased need to use equipment in Ex areas. Such equipment is termed "Ex equipment"
 
Where do you commonly find Ex equipment?
Ex equipment in such areas include:
, Automotive refuelling stations or petrol stations
, Oil refineries, rigs and processing plants
, Chemical processing plants
, Printing industries, paper and textiles
, Hospital operating theatres
, Aircraft refuelling and hangars
, Surface coating industries
, Underground coal mines
, Sewerage treatment plants
, Gas pipelines and distribution centers
, Grain handling and storage
, Woodworking areas
, Sugar refineries
, Metal surface grinding, especially aluminum dusts and particles
 
IECEx International Certification System
In addition to the preparation of International Standards, the IEC facilitates the operation of Conformity Assessment Systems. One such System is the IECEx System The IECEx System comprises the following:
, The IECEx Certified Equipment Scheme
,  The IECEx Certified Service Facilities Scheme
,  The IECEx Conformity Mark Licensing System
, The IECEx Certification of Personnel Competencies
Picture
Hazardous zone classification
This Technical Measures Document refers to the classification of plant into hazardous areas, and the systematic identification and control of ignition sources. 
The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR) provide for the first time a specific legal requirement to carry out a hazardous area study, and document the conclusions, in the form of zones.
General PrinciplesHazardous Area Classification for Flammable Gases and VapoursArea classification may be carried out by direct analogy with typical installations described in established codes, or by more quantitative methods that require a more detailed knowledge of the plant. The starting point is to identify sources of release of flammable gas or vapour. These may arise from constant activities; from time to time in normal operation; or as the result of some unplanned event. In addition, inside process equipment may be a hazardous area, if both gas/vapour and air are present, though there is no actual release.
Catastrophic failures, such as vessel or line rupture are not considered by an area classification study. A hazard identification process such as a Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) or a Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) should consider these abnormal events.
The most commonly used standard in the UK for determining area extent and classification is BS EN 60079 part 101, which has broad applicability. The current version makes clear the direct link between the amounts of flammable vapour that may be released, the ventilation at that location, and the zone number. It contains a simplistic calculation relating the size of zone to a rate of release of gas or vapour, but it is not helpful for liquid releases, where the rate of vaporisation controls the size of the hazardous area.
Other sources of advice, which describe more sophisticated approaches, are the Institute of Petroleum Model Code of Practice (Area Classification Code for Petroleum Installations, 2002), and the Institution of Gas Engineers Safety Recommendations SR25, (2001). The IP code is for use by refinery and petrochemical type operations. The IGE code addresses specifically transmission, distribution and storage facilities for natural gas, rather than gas utilisation plant, but some of the information will be relevant to larger scale users.
ZoningHazardous areas are defined in DSEAR as "any place in which an explosive atmosphere may occur in quantities such as to require special precautions to protect the safety of workers". In this context, 'special precautions' is best taken as relating to the construction, installation and use of apparatus, as given in BS EN 60079 -10.
Area classification is a method of analysing and classifying the environment where explosive gas atmospheres may occur. The main purpose is to facilitate the proper selection and installation of apparatus to be used safely in that environment, taking into account the properties of the flammable materials that will be present. DSEAR specifically extends the original scope of this analysis, to take into account non-electrical sources of ignition, and mobile equipment that creates an ignition risk.
Hazardous areas are classified into zones based on an assessment of the frequency of the occurrence and duration of an explosive gas atmosphere, as follows:
  • Zone 0: An area in which an explosive gas atmosphere is present continuously or for long periods;
  • Zone 1: An area in which an explosive gas atmosphere is likely to occur in normal operation;
  • Zone 2: An area in which an explosive gas atmosphere is not likely to occur in normal operation and, if it occurs, will only exist for a short time.
Various sources have tried to place time limits on to these zones, but none have been officially adopted. The most common values used are:
  • Zone 0: Explosive atmosphere for more than 1000h/yr
  • Zone 1: Explosive atmosphere for more than 10, but less than 1000 h/yr
  • Zone 2: Explosive atmosphere for less than 10h/yr, but still sufficiently likely as to require controls over ignition sources.
Where people wish to quantify the zone definitions, these values are the most appropriate, but for the majority of situations a purely qualitative approach is adequate.
When the hazardous areas of a plant have been classified, the remainder will be defined as non-hazardous, sometimes referred to as 'safe areas'.
The zone definitions take no account of the consequences of a release. If this aspect is important, it may be addressed by upgrading the specification of equipment or controls over activities allowed within the zone. The alternative of specifying the extent of zones more conservatively is not generally recommended, as it leads to more difficulties with equipment selection, and illogicalities in respect of control over health effects from vapours assumed to be present. Where occupiers choose to define extensive areas as Zone 1, the practical consequences could usefully be discussed during site inspection.
As an example:A proposal was made to zone an aircraft hanger as Zone 1, although the use of fuels handled above their flash point would be a rare event. It proved difficult to obtain a floor-cleaning machine certified for Zone 1 areas, though the floor needed sweeping regularly. The option of writing out an exception to normal instructions to allow a non Ex-protected machine to be used regularly is not recommended. Instead, a more realistic assessment of the zones is needed, and special instructions issued for the rare event of using more volatile fuels.
A hazardous area extent and classification study involves due consideration and documentation of the following:
  • The flammable materials that may be present;
  • The physical properties and characteristics of each of the flammable materials;
  • The source of potential releases and how they can form explosive atmospheres;
  • Prevailing operating temperatures and pressures;
  • Presence, degree and availability of ventilation (forced and natural);
  • Dispersion of released vapours to below flammable limits;
  • The probability of each release scenario.
These factors enable appropriate selection of zone type and zone extent, and also of equipment. The IP code gives a methodology for estimating release rates from small diameter holes with pressurised sources, and shows how both the buoyancy and momentum of the release influence the extent of a zone. It tabulates values for an LPG mixture, gasoline, natural gas, and refinery hydrogen for pressures up to 100barg. Similarly the IGE code gives a methodology for natural gas, relating the leak rate to the hole-size and the operating pressure. The tables of dispersion distances to the zone boundary address in the main quite large diameter deliberate vents. There is in practice little overlap between the codes.
The results of this work should be documented in Hazardous Area Classification data sheets, supported by appropriate reference drawings showing the extent of the zones around (including above and below where appropriate) the plant item.
Selection of EquipmentDSEAR sets out the link between zones, and the equipment that may be installed in that zone. This applies to new or newly modified installations. The equipment categories are defined by the ATEX equipment directive, set out in UK law as the Equipment and Protective Systems for Use in Potentially Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 1996. Standards set out different protection concepts, with further subdivisions for some types of equipment according to gas group and temperature classification. Most of the electrical standards have been developed over many years and are now set at international level, while standards for non-electrical equipment are only just becoming available from CEN.
The DSEAR ACOP describes the provisions concerning existing equipment.
There are different technical means (protection concepts) of building equipment to the different categories. These, the standard current in mid 2003, and the letter giving the type of protection are listed below.
​
Zone 0Zone 1Zone 2
Category 1Category 2Category 3
'ia' intrinsically safe
EN 50020, 2002'd' - Flameproof enclosure
EN 50018 2000Electrical
Type 'n' - EN 50021 1999
Non electrical
EN 13463-1, 2001
Ex s - Special protection if specifically certified for Zone 0'p' - Pressurised
EN 50016 2002 
 'q' - Powder filling
EN 50017, 1998 
 'o' - Oil immersion
EN 50015, 1998 
 'e' - Increased safety
EN 50019, 2000 
 'ib' - Intrinsic safety
EN 50020, 2002 
 'm' - Encapsulation
EN 50028, 1987 
 's' - Special protection Correct selection of electrical equipment for hazardous areas requires the following information:
  • Classification of the hazardous area (as in zones shown in the table above);
  • Temperature class or ignition temperature of the gas or vapour involved according to the table below:
Temperature ClassificationMaximum Surface Temperature, °C Ignition Temperature of gas or vapour, °C
T1450>450
T2300>300
T3200>200
T4135>135
T5100>100
T685>85
If several different flammable materials may be present within a particular area, the material that gives the highest classification dictates the overall area classification. The IP code considers specifically the issue of hydrogen containing process streams as commonly found on refinery plants. Consideration should be shown for flammable material that may be generated due to interaction between chemical species.
Ignition Sources - Identification and ControlIgnition sources may be:
  • Flames;
  • Direct fired space and process heating;
  • Use of cigarettes/matches etc;
  • Cutting and welding flames;
  • Hot surfaces;
  • Heated process vessels such as dryers and furnaces;
  • Hot process vessels;
  • Space heating equipment;
  • Mechanical machinery;
  • Electrical equipment and lights
  • Spontaneous heating;
  • Friction heating or sparks;
  • Impact sparks;
  • Sparks from electrical equipment;
  • Stray currents from electrical equipment
  • Electrostatic discharge sparks:
  • Lightning strikes.
  • Electromagnetic radiation of different wavelengths
  • Vehicles, unless specially designed or modified are likely to contain a range of potential ignition sources
Sources of ignition should be effectively controlled in all hazardous areas by a combination of design measures, and systems of work:
  • Using electrical equipment and instrumentation classified for the zone in which it is located. New mechanical equipment will need to be selected in the same way. (See above);
  • Earthing of all plant/ equipment
  • Elimination of surfaces above auto-ignition temperatures of flammable materials being handled/stored (see above);
  • Provision of lightning protection
  • Correct selection of vehicles/internal combustion engines that have to work in the zoned areas 
  • Correct selection of equipment to avoid high intensity electromagnetic radiation sources, e.g. limitations on the power input to fibre optic systems, avoidance of high intensity lasers or sources of infrared radiation
  • Prohibition of smoking/use of matches/lighters
  • Controls over the use of normal vehicles
  • Controls over activities that create intermittent hazardous areas, e.g. tanker loading/unloading
  • Control of maintenance activities that may cause sparks/hot surfaces/naked flames through a Permit to Work System
  • Precautions to control the risk from pyrophoric scale, usually associated with formation of ferrous sulphide inside process equipment
Direct Fired Heaters, Hot Oil Systems and Processes Operating Above Auto-Ignition TemperaturesA range of petrochemical and refinery processes use direct fired heaters, e.g. steam crackers for ethylene production. Clearly, if the fuel supply to the heater or the pipework carrying the process fluid leaks close to the furnace, any leak must be expected to find a source of ignition, either directly at the flames, or by a surface heated by a flame. In these circumstances, hazardous area classification, and appropriate selection of ATEX equipment is not suitable as a basis of safety for preventing fire and explosion risks.
Instead, safety should be achieved by a combination of a high standard of integrity of fuel and process pipelines, together with a means of rapid detection and isolation of any pipes that do fail. The consequences of the failure of a pipe carrying process materials within the furnace should be considered in any HAZOP study.
Other processes (such as hot oil heating circuits) may handle products above their auto-ignition temperature. Any such processes should be specifically identified in a safety case. Again, area classification is not a suitable means of controlling the ignition risks, and the same considerations apply, as with fired heaters.
Lightning ProtectionProtection against lightning involves installation of a surge protection device between each non-earth bonded core of the cable and the local structure. Further guidance can be found in BS 6651:19991 - (Code of practice for protection of structures against lightning). Ignitions caused by lightning cannot be eliminated entirely, particularly with floating roof tanks, where vapour is usually present around the rim seal. In these circumstances, measures to mitigate the consequences of a fire should be provided.
VehiclesMost normal vehicles contain a wide range of ignition sources. These will include electrical circuits; the inlet and exhaust of any internal combustion engine; electrostatic build up; overheating brakes, and other moving parts. Site rules should be clear where normal road vehicles may be taken, and areas where they must be excluded.
Standard EN 17551 sets out the requirements for diesel powdered ATEX category 2 or 3 lift trucks. Electric powered vehicles can also be built using a combination of this standard and the normal electrical standards. No specification is available for vehicles with spark ignition engines, and it is unlikely that such an engine could be built economically. Vehicles certified to ATEX requirements are however expensive, and for many applications an unprotected type has to be extensively rebuilt. Consequently, many employers are likely to try and justify not zoning storage compounds, where lift trucks handle flammable liquids or gases in containers. In some stores, perhaps with limited use of a vehicle, this may be acceptable. Discussions have been held with the British Chemical Distributors and Traders Association, with the objective of clarifying when storage areas should be classified as zone 2. The conclusions from this exercise will be made available in due course. Discussions are also ongoing, about vehicles with gas detection systems, designed to shut the engine and isolate other sources of ignition in the event of a gas release. At present these are sold without any claim for ATEX compliance, but with the suggestion they may be useful in cases of remote risk.
For the purposes of COMAH, an assessment is needed of the risk that an ignition within a storage compound will produce a major accident, either directly or because a fire or explosion spreads to involve other materials. If this is possible, it is more appropriate to provide controls to prevent the spread, rather than simply apply more conservative zoning, and more restrictive rules on the equipment used in the store.
Where specialist vehicles (e.g. cranes) are needed during maintenance operations, proper controls and plant isolation may allow the normal zones to be suspended. Typically these will involve written instructions, as specified in DSEAR schedule 1, or a formal permit to work system.
Many sites will have operations of filling and emptying road tankers with flammable materials. Controls will be needed to prevent or minimise the release of gas or vapour but controls over ignition sources are also needed. Hazardous areas may be considered to exist during the transfer operation, but should not be present once the transfer is complete. Safe systems of work are needed to ensure safety where such 'transient' zones exist.
Factors for Assessor of a Safety Case to Consider
  • Is a full set of plans identifying hazardous areas available? For a large site they need not all be provided in the report, but those examples relevant to the representative set of major accidents upon which the ALARP demonstration is based must be included.
  • Have all flammable substances present have been considered during area classification, including raw materials, intermediates and by products, final product and effluents? Commonly these will be grouped for the purposes of any area classification study.
  • Locations where a large release is possible and the extent of hazardous areas has been minimised by the use of mechanical ventilation should be identified, e.g. gas turbine power generation units, compressor houses. Some reference to design codes, and commissioning checks to ensure the ventilation achieves the design aim, should be provided. The consequences of a loss of power to the system should be included in any section looking at other consequences of power loss.
  • Have appropriate standards been used for selection of equipment in hazardous areas? Existing plant will not meet the formula in DSEAR, but older standards distinguished between electrical equipment suitable for zones 0, 1 and 2. Does the report identify old electrical equipment still in service in a hazardous area, and what assessment has been made to ensure it remains safe for use?
  • Passive items like new walls and buildings can influence this if they obstruct natural ventilation of adjacent plant
  • Have all ignition sources been considered? A check list is provided in the DSEAR ACOP on control and mitigation measures, and BS EN 1127 part 1
Factors that could be considered during an on site inspection
  • If there are any large areas of zone 1 on the drawings, is there evidence that by design and operation controls, the sources of release and consequently the location and extent of hazardous areas have been minimised?
  • Do any zone 2 areas extend to places where the occupier has inadequate control over activities that could create an ignition source, or is there any suggestion that the zone boundaries have been arbitrarily adjusted to avoid this?
  • Has ignition protected electrical equipment been installed and maintained by suitably trained staff.
  • Are the risks from static discharges controlled properly? Earthing of plant, drums and tankers is the most basic requirement; other precautions are described in the references
  • What control measures over ignition sources are adopted in hazardous areas during maintenance; where ignition sources must be introduced, typical precautions include the use of supplementary ventilation, portable gas detectors, and inserting of sections of plant. 
Dust ExplosionsThe COMAH Regulations do not apply to any material if the only risk created is that of a dust explosion. However, many toxic materials are handled in fine powder form, and a serious dust explosion could cause a major accident. A dust explosion involving a non-toxic dust like polyethylene would not result in a major accident as defined in the regulations, unless it also led to loss of containment of a COMAH substance. A dust explosion could then be an initiator of a major accident. Measures to prevent major accidents should address all potential initiators.
DSEAR requires that hazardous area classification for flammable dusts should be undertaken in the same manner as that for flammable gases and vapours. Zoning as described above may be applied, replacing 'gas atmosphere' with 'dust/air mixtures'. The zone numbers used are 20, 21 and 22, corresponding to 0,1 and 2 used for gases/vapours
The only relevant standard to help people zone their plant is BS EN 50281 part 3, 20021, which is an adaptation of the IEC equivalent.
Where toxic dusts are processed, releases into the general atmosphere should be prevented, and the extent of any zone 21 or 22 outside the containment system should be minimal or non-existent. The inside of different parts of the plant may need to be zoned as 20, 21 or 22, depending on the conditions at particular locations.
Classification of dusts relating to autoignition and minimum ignition current is undertaken similarly to gases/vapours, but involves additional complications.
The explosibility of dusts is dependent upon a number of factors:
  • chemical composition;
  • particle size;
  • oxygen concentration;
Where toxic dusts are handled, in most cases occupiers will need to carry out testing of the product for its explosion properties. Companies able to undertaken such testing are listed in the IChemE's book on the prevention of dust explosions. There is no legally defined test for an explosible dust. However, for many years we have used a small-scale screening test, the vertical tube test, described in HSG 103. The issues about representative samples of dust, and other factors that might cause the results to vary are also discussed in this guidance. In general, dusts with a particle size greater than 500 µm are unlikely to cause an explosion. For most chemical products it is preferable to test dust taken from the process, but if the particle size distribution varies, it is common to test material that passes a 63-micron sieve, and take this as the worst case.
Ignition due to a hot surface is possible, but the temperature needed to ignite a dust layer depends on layer thickness and contact time. For COMAH sites with toxic dusts, the most likely hazard would arise in drying processes, if substantial quantities were held for extended periods hot enough to start self heating or smouldering combustion.
Status of GuidanceExisting codes of practice provide information with respect to good practice for hazardous area classification. The standards detailing selection of appropriate electrical apparatus have been updated to take into consideration ventilation effects.
European equipment standards may become 'harmonised' when a reference to them is published in the Official Journal of the European Community. A list of ATEX harmonised standards can be checked on the EU web site:
Equipment built to such a harmonised standard may assume automatic conformity with those essential safety requirements of relevant directives that are covered by the standard. The EPS regulations describe the conformity assessment procedures that apply to different types of equipment.

Fire proof rating

8/15/2020

 
The fire proof system can be divided into two aspects, these are passive and active protection.
Active fire protection - manual and automatic detection and suppression of fires,
For example:
Fire or smoke detector system
Fire alarm systems.
Fire sprinkler systems
Fire extinguisher
Firefighter
Passive fire protection (PFP) - The installation of fire rated walls, ceiling and floor assemblies to form fire compartments intended to limit the spread of fire, high temperatures, and smoke.
For example:
To improve fire resistance performance of material
To paint the fire-retardant coating, such as cementitious and epoxy intumescent.
To cover the insulated panel

Fire Testing
For PFP materials to be classified for offshore use they must meet three main fire-testing requirements that are commonly accepted. These are Standard fire test, Hydrocarbon pool fire test and Hydrocarbon jet fire test.
 
Fire proof classification according to Standard Fire test
There are three classification which are A, B and C class.
1. "A" class divisions:
1). They are constructed of steel or other equivalent material;
2). They are suitably stiffened;
3). They are constructed as to be capable of preventing the passage of smoke and flame to the end of the one-hour standard fire test;
4). They are insulated with approved non-combustible materials such that the average temperature of the unexposed side will not rise more than 140ºC above the original temperature, nor will the temperature, at any one point, including any joint, rise more than 180ºC above the original temperature, within the time listed below:
     Class "A-60”   60 min
     Class "A-30”   30 min
     Class "A-15”   15 min
     Class "A-0”      0 min
2. "B" class divisions:
1). They are constructed of approved non-combustible materials and all materials used in the construction and erection of "B" class divisions are non-combustible, with the exception that combustible veneers may be permitted provided they meet other appropriate requirements of this chapter;
2). They are constructed as to be capable of preventing the passage of flame to the end of the first half hour of the standard fire test;
3). They have an insulation value such that the average temperature of the unexposed side will not rise more than 140ºC above the original temperature, nor will the temperature at any one point, including any joint, rise more than 225ºC above the original temperature, within the time listed below:
     Class "B-15"    15 min
     Class "B-0"       0 min
3.  "C" class divisions 
Divisions constructed of approved noncombustible materials. They need meet neither requirements relative to the passage of smoke and flame nor limitations relative to the temperature rise.

Fire proof classification according to Hydrocarbon Pool Fire test
"H" class divisions:
1. They are constructed of steel or other equivalent material;
2. They are suitably stiffened;
3. They are constructed as to be capable of preventing the passage of smoke and flame to the end of the two-hour standard fire test;
4. They are insulated with approved non-combustible materials such that the average temperature of the unexposed side will not rise more than 140ºC above the original temperature, nor will the temperature, at any one point, including any joint, rise more than 180ºC above the original temperature, within the time listed below:
     Class "H-120”    120 min
     Class "H-60”       60 min
     Class "H-0”          0 min

Fire proof classification according to Hydrocarbon Jet Fire test
"J" class divisions:
1. They are constructed of steel or other equivalent material;
2. They are suitably stiffened;
3. They are constructed as to be capable of preventing the passage of smoke and flame to the end of the first half hour standard fire test;
4. They are insulated with approved non-combustible materials such that the average temperature of the unexposed side will not rise more than 140ºC above the original temperature, nor will the temperature, at any one point, including any joint, rise more than 180ºC above the original temperature, within the time listed below:
     Class "J-60”    60 min
     Class "J-30”    30 min

IEC 60079-13:2017

8/15/2020

 
IEC 60079-13:2017 gives requirements for the design, construction, assessment, verification and marking of rooms used to protect internal equipment:
– located in a Zone 1 or Zone 2 or Zone 21 or Zone 22 explosive atmosphere without an internal source of gas/vapour release and protected by pressurization;
– located in a Zone 2 explosive atmosphere with or without an internal source of gas/vapour release and protected by artificial ventilation;
– located in a non-hazardous area, containing an internal source of gas/vapour release and protected by artificial ventilation;
– located in a Zone 1 or Zone 2 or Zone 21 or Zone 22 explosive atmosphere containing an internal source of gas/vapour release and protected by both pressurization and artificial ventilation.
The term "room" used in this document includes single rooms, multiple rooms, a complete building or a room contained within a building. A room is intended to facilitate the entry of personnel and includes inlet and outlet ducts. An acoustic hood and other like enclosures designed to permit the entry of personnel can be considered as a room.
This document also includes requirements related safety devices and controls necessary to ensure that artificial ventilation, purging and pressurization is established and maintained.
A room assembled or constructed on site, can be either on land or off-shore. The room is primarily intended for installation by an end-user but could be constructed and assessed at a manufacturer’s facility, where the final construction such as ducting can be completed on site.
This document does not specify the methods that may be required to ensure adequate air quality for personnel with regard to toxicity and temperature within the room. National or other regulations and requirements may  exist to ensure the safety of personnel in this regard.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2010. This edition constitutes a technical revision.
This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition:
a) modification of the title of this document to include artificially ventilated room "v" in addition to pressurized room "p";
b) addition of types of protection "pb", "pc", and "vc" and removal of types of protection "px", "py", "pz" and "pv";
c) definition of the differences between pressurization and artificial ventilation types of protection;
d) removal of protection of rooms with an inert gas or a flammable gas from the scope of this document;
e) addition of an informative annex to include examples of applications where types of protection pressurization or artificial ventilation or pressurization and artificial ventilation can be used and associated guidelines.

Container structure

7/17/2020

 
CONTAINER STRUCTURE
1. Basic frame
The base frame consists of two (2) lower side rails, several cross members and a gooseneck tunnel, which are welded together as a subassembly.
 
2.Front End
The front end will be composed of corrugated end wall and front end frame,
which are welded together as a sub-assembly.    
 
3. Rear End 
Rear end is composed of Rear End Frame which consists of one door sill, two
corner posts, one rear header with header plate and four corner fittings, which
are welded together as a sub-assembly, and Door Systems with locking
devices.
 
4.Side Wall Assembly
Side Walls Each side wall will be composed of a number of sheets for the intermediate (inner) parts and outer panels at each end of side wall, fully vertically corrugated into trapezium section, butt welded together to form one panel by automatic welding. 
 
5.Roof
The roof will be constructed by several die-stamp corrugated steel sheets with a certain upwards camber at the center of each trough and corrugation, these sheets are butt jointed together to form one panel by automatic welding. 
 
 




<<Previous

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    December 2013

    Categories

    All
    A60
    Accommodation Cabin
    ADNOC
    BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM(BESS)
    Container Accessories
    Container Standards
    Container Test
    CUTTING SKIPS
    Drop Test
    Dry Container
    ESS Container
    FEA
    Feedback From Clients
    FREEZER
    Iso Container
    Laboratory Container
    LIFTING TEST
    MCC Shelter
    |MWD/LWD Cabin
    NEGATIVE PRESSURE
    Offshore Accommodation Module
    Offshore Living Quarter
    Offshore Workshop Container
    POSITIVE PRESSURE
    Pressurised Container
    PROCESS OF CONTAINER
    Reefer Container
    Refrigerated
    Refrigerated Container
    SEWAGE TREATMENT
    Temperature Control
    Temporary Refuge
    Temporary Refuge (TR) Shelter
    TLS OFFSHORE CONTAINER
    WATER TIGHTNESS
    WELDING INSPECTION
    Workshop Container

Featured products
Intelligent pressurised container
​Temporary refuge (TR) shelter, toxic gas refuge (TGR)​
​Battery e
nergy storage system (BESS) container
Containerised waste water treatment plant
Fresh water generator container
Reefer container
Laboratory container, Workshop container
Accommodation container
​
Offshore closed container
Company
About us

News & Blogs
Product photos & videos
Privacy policies
​Terms and conditions
Contact us
Communities
Facebook
​Twitter
Linkedin
Instagram
​Pinterest
​Flickr
Contact us
Email: sales@tls-containers.com
Hotline: +65-65637288; +65-31386967
All Rights Reserved 2020 © TLS Offshore Containers / TLS Special Containers
  • Home
    • About us
    • Quality, Health, Safety and Environment
    • Manufacturing standards
    • Container certificates
  • Containerised solutions
    • Intelligent pressurised container | MUD logging cabin
    • Battery energy storage system (BESS) container
    • Laboratory container | workshop container | Equipment containers
    • Temporary refuge shelter | Toxic gas refuge | Safe haven
    • Offshore accommodation cabin | office container
    • Reefer container | Refrigerated container
    • Intelligent waste water treatment container
    • Fresh water generator container
  • Cargo Containers
    • Offshore closed containers
    • Half height container
    • Cargo basket
    • Cutting skip, waste skip
    • Drum basket
    • Offshore Tank
    • Mini container
    • Open top container
  • Product photos & videos
  • News & Blogs
  • Contact us