Short Summary
Specify a refrigerated container from the cargo temperature profile, loading pattern, journey, ambient conditions and handling plan. Confirm the setpoint and allowable excursion, pull-down duty, airflow, cargo stowage, power supply, monitoring, defrost, hygiene, refrigeration safety, transport approval and maintenance support. “Reefer container” is not a complete technical specification.
The Short Answer
Choose a refrigerated container by starting with the cargo and its complete temperature-control process. The supplier needs to know the cargo temperature at loading, required setpoint, permitted range, journey duration, loading frequency, ambient conditions, packing arrangement, power availability and monitoring needs. A refrigeration unit can maintain a suitable pre-cooled cargo, but it may not be sized to pull down warm product quickly or recover from repeated door openings.
ISO 1496-2:2018 sets basic specifications and testing requirements for ISO series 1 thermal containers used in international interchange by road, rail and sea. It is useful for the transport container scope, but product handling, food safety, pharmaceutical quality and site operation may impose additional requirements.
1. Define the Cargo Temperature Requirement Precisely
State the cargo type, product temperature at loading, required setpoint, allowable operating range, alarm limits, maximum excursion, journey duration and the party responsible for releasing or rejecting product after an excursion. Do not use terms such as “chilled” or “frozen” as a substitute for a temperature profile.
Record whether the container will carry fresh, frozen, pharmaceutical, chemical, laboratory or another controlled-temperature cargo. The cargo may also require humidity control, fresh-air exchange, ethylene management, segregation from odors, cleanable surfaces, special packaging, validated temperature mapping or continuous records. These are product requirements, not generic container features.
Distinguish between a steady-state holding duty and a pull-down duty. Loading warm product into a reefer and expecting the machine to cool it rapidly can lead to unacceptable cargo temperature, high energy demand and poor airflow. If pull-down is required, specify the initial product temperature, product mass, packaging resistance, loading time, desired pull-down time, ambient condition and door-opening schedule so the duty can be evaluated.
2. Design Around Airflow, Not Only Setpoint
Refrigerated cargo is cooled by air circulation. The cargo plan must leave the intended air paths open at the floor, side walls, ceiling and doors. Dense packing, blocked return-air grilles, damaged floor channels, unsealed cartons or poorly positioned pallet loads can create hot or cold zones even when the unit display shows the correct setpoint.
Provide cargo dimensions, pallet pattern, gross mass, loading direction, maximum stack height, clearance requirement, packaging type, airflow openings and whether the cargo is pre-cooled. Ask for the recommended stowage plan and any limits on floor loading or aisle obstruction. Where temperature uniformity is critical, agree the location and number of sensors, mapping points, logging interval, calibration expectation and data-retention period.
Door opening is a design input. State how often doors will open, how long loading or picking takes, whether strip curtains or ante-rooms are planned, and whether the unit will work as stationary cold storage rather than a sealed transport container. A container that performs well on a continuous voyage can require a different refrigeration and access arrangement for high-frequency site use.
3. Confirm the Refrigeration and Power Boundary
Specify the operating voltage, frequency, phase, available supply quality, cable connection, breaker arrangement, generator backup, starting current, auxiliary consumption and required autonomy if the package will be powered from a battery or generator. Confirm behavior after a power interruption: automatic restart, alarm notifications, setpoint retention, defrost recovery and remote monitoring.
The refrigeration concept must suit the lowest and highest ambient conditions, solar exposure, wind, dust, salt, altitude and installation clearance. For stationary use, evaluate condenser airflow, discharge recirculation, noise, access for cleaning and service, drainage and protection from impact. For marine or coastal sites, material selection and coating must address the local corrosion environment.
Defrost is not a minor detail. State the cargo sensitivity, expected humidity and frost load, defrost method, schedule, termination control, drainage and acceptable temperature effect. Poor drainage can create ice, hygiene and slip hazards; an unsuitable defrost sequence can create avoidable excursions.
4. Specify Monitoring, Alarms and Records
Decide which temperature is being monitored: supply air, return air, cargo simulant, product probe, room air or another point. These measurements answer different questions. The data system should identify sensor location, calibration status, recording interval, timestamp source, alarm limits, acknowledgement procedure, communication route and data export format.
For higher-consequence cargo, agree alarm escalation: local beacon or horn, SMS or email alerts through the site system, power-failure notification, door-open alarm, refrigeration fault, high and low temperature, sensor failure and communications loss. The monitoring design must include who responds and what they do; an unacknowledged alarm does not protect cargo.
If the container is part of a quality-controlled cold chain, confirm whether records need to be tamper-evident, retained for a stated period, available remotely, or reviewed before unloading. These requirements should be stated in the procurement documents rather than added after commissioning.
5. Address Hygiene, Materials and Refrigerant Safety
The inside of the container must be cleanable and suitable for the intended cargo. Define floor finish, wall and ceiling lining, drainage, lighting protection, door seals, shelving or racking, washable details, cleaning agents, odor control, pest prevention and procedures for handling spillages or damaged goods.
Refrigerant selection and system safety must be evaluated for the exact design. ISO 20854:2019 addresses safety requirements for thermal-container refrigerating systems using flammable refrigerants. If the system uses a flammable refrigerant, do not treat it as a routine reefer option: confirm charge quantity, ventilation, electrical equipment, detection, ignition-source control, marking, service procedures, emergency response and applicable local requirements.
Where the container is installed near occupied areas, process equipment or hazardous zones, the refrigeration system, electrical equipment and ventilation need a project-specific assessment. A standard transport reefer arrangement may not meet the requirements of the installed location.
6. Separate Transport Compliance from Operating Suitability
The International Convention for Safe Containers sets an international framework for testing, approval, inspection and maintenance of many freight containers used in international transport. ISO 1496-2 covers thermal-container specifications and tests for ISO series 1 interchange. These references can be important when the unit is moved as a freight container, but they do not establish the cargo-quality process or every stationary installation requirement.
For a custom refrigerated module, clarify the transport classification, dimensions, maximum gross mass, center of gravity, lifting points, forklift restrictions, power-down condition, door restraint, refrigeration preservation and sea fastening. Also identify the certification boundary: a transport plate does not by itself approve the product, its packaging, its temperature qualification or the site electrical and fire interfaces.
7. Plan Acceptance Testing Around the Real Use Case
Factory acceptance testing should confirm identity, workmanship, door operation, seals, insulation integrity where specified, refrigeration function, controls, alarms, defrost, lighting, electrical protection, monitoring and documentation. The agreed test must define test ambient, duration, setpoint, sensor positions, acceptance limits and the form of the test record.
Site acceptance testing should prove the installation-specific interfaces: power source, remote alarms, communications, drainage, location airflow, noise, access, grounding and operating response after interruptions. If the cargo process requires temperature mapping or operational qualification, agree who performs it and against which protocol.
Information the Buyer Should Provide with the RFQ
- Cargo type, quantity, packaging, initial temperature and target temperature profile
- Permitted temperature range, alarm limits, excursion policy and record-retention need
- Journey or storage duration, loading schedule, door-opening frequency and ambient conditions
- Pull-down requirement, if any, with product mass and required cooling time
- Pallet plan, stack height, airflow clearances, floor load and required internal fittings
- Available power supply, backup power, cable route, site voltage and restart expectations
- Monitoring points, remote communications, alarm escalation and calibration requirements
- Hygiene, cleaning, drainage, lighting, odor-control and product-segregation requirements
- Refrigerant and safety requirements, hazardous-area information and fire interfaces where applicable
- Transport, lifting, installation, FAT, SAT, documentation, spare-parts and service requirements
Procurement Takeaway
The correct refrigerated container is the one that controls the actual cargo temperature through the real loading, journey and site conditions—not merely one that reaches a nominal setpoint when empty. TLS refrigerated container solutions can be configured around project-defined temperature, power, monitoring and handling requirements. Send the temperature profile, cargo-loading plan, site utilities, ambient conditions, monitoring needs and acceptance criteria for a focused technical review.
FAQ
Can a reefer cool warm cargo down quickly?
Only if it has been selected for that pull-down duty. Many refrigerated containers are intended primarily to maintain cargo that has already been cooled. Provide the initial product temperature, mass, packaging and required pull-down time for an engineering assessment.
Is the unit display temperature the same as cargo temperature?
Not necessarily. Displayed values often reflect supply or return air. Cargo temperature depends on airflow, loading, packaging, sensor location and time. Critical cargo may require additional probes or mapping.
Does an ISO thermal-container standard guarantee pharmaceutical or food compliance?
No. ISO 1496-2 relates to container specifications and testing for international interchange. Product-quality requirements, operating procedures, monitoring and qualification must be defined separately.
What should I include in a refrigerated-container FAT?
Define the test ambient, setpoint, duration, sensor locations, acceptance limits, door and alarm tests, defrost test, electrical and monitoring checks, and the signed test record. Site acceptance should then verify the installed interfaces.
Further Reading
• ISO 1496-2:2018 — Series 1 thermal containers
• ISO 20854:2019 — Thermal containers using flammable refrigerants
• IMO — International Convention for Safe Containers (CSC)
• TLS — Offshore refrigerated containers
Short Summary
A containerized data center should be specified as an operating system, not as a container filled with IT racks. Define the IT load and growth path, availability objective, power architecture, cooling concept, environmental conditions, network entry, fire strategy, physical security, transport route, installation interfaces, commissioning tests, and service model before asking for a quotation.
The Short Answer
Choose a containerized data center only after the project has defined what digital services must remain available, the load those services create, and the site conditions in which the package will operate. Racks, UPS units, cooling equipment and an enclosure are only parts of the solution. A workable package must also have a credible power and heat-rejection path, network resilience, controlled access, fire detection and response, transport and lifting arrangements, and enough room to maintain critical equipment safely.
The ISO/IEC 22237 series provides a useful framework for discussing data-center facilities and infrastructure. Part 1 addresses common concepts and a classification approach based on availability, security and energy efficiency. It does not replace the project-specific engineering needed for a remote, marine or offshore installation.
1. Start with the Service, Then the IT Load
Ask what the site will lose if the data center becomes unavailable. The answer may be production data, telecommunications, process visibility, safety support functions, local edge computing, video, access control or a mix of services. Separate life-safety and control-system requirements from general business IT; their availability, cyber-security and change-control requirements may differ.
Create a load schedule that identifies installed and expected IT power, rack density, power factor where relevant, diversity, peak processing periods, growth increments and the heat released by IT equipment. Include network equipment, storage, monitoring, lighting, controls and any local support loads. A room rated by floor area or a container selected by length tells the supplier very little about real cooling and electrical demand.
Define the initial configuration and the design horizon. A package that operates efficiently at 30 kW but is expected to reach 120 kW within two years should be designed around the expansion strategy. State whether the growth will be achieved by spare rack positions, modular UPS blocks, additional cooling capacity, an external plant or a second module.
2. State the Availability Objective in Operational Terms
Avoid requesting “Tier-like” or “high availability” without explaining what that means at the site. Describe the tolerable interruption, recovery time, maintenance conditions, utility reliability, fuel logistics and which single failures must be survived.
Define the power path from source to IT load. The scope may include utility or generator incomers, switchgear, transformer, UPS, batteries, distribution boards, rack PDUs, bypass arrangements, earthing, surge protection and monitoring. State the required ride-through time, generator-start sequence, load shedding, maintenance bypass philosophy and the behavior after a failed UPS module, battery string, cooling unit, breaker or controller.
Redundancy language such as N, N+1 or 2N only becomes useful when its boundary is clear. For example, redundant UPS capacity will not maintain service if both paths depend on one upstream breaker, one room-level control panel, one fuel-transfer system or one cable route. Ask the supplier to identify shared elements and maintenance constraints in the single-line diagram and failure-mode review.
3. Engineer Cooling and Heat Rejection for the Actual Site
Every kilowatt consumed by IT becomes heat that has to leave the module. The cooling system must be selected from the site design conditions, not an annual average weather value. Specify outdoor dry-bulb and humidity ranges, solar exposure, altitude, dust, salt, driven rain, wind, corrosive contaminants, water availability, permitted water treatment and any low-temperature or icing conditions.
For air-cooled systems, confirm the location of condensers or dry coolers, airflow paths, pressure drops, discharge recirculation, salt protection, noise, access and crane-removal route. For liquid or chilled-water systems, define the water-quality boundary, freeze protection, leak detection, pumps, pipe materials, isolation, external connections, drainage and who owns the central plant.
The desired IT inlet conditions, permitted temperature and humidity range, alarm thresholds, lead-lag control, failed-unit behavior and emergency ventilation should appear in the control narrative. If the data hall contains high-density racks, specify the intended rack layout, blanking panels, containment approach, cable routing and allowable airflow obstruction. Cooling redundancy cannot compensate for uncontrolled air bypass inside the module.
4. Treat Connectivity as a Physical and Operational Interface
Remote sites need a connectivity design that is as deliberate as the power design. Provide the carrier or satellite arrangement, bandwidth, latency expectations, network demarcation, fibre or copper entry points, route diversity, cable protection, grounding, surge protection, telecom-room interfaces and requirements for out-of-band management.
Two services from the same physical landing point or mast may not deliver meaningful resilience. Map the route from each external provider to the active network device and record common ducts, cabinets, penetrations, power supplies and environmental risks. Protect cable entries against water, rodents, fire and electromagnetic exposure as appropriate to the site.
Cyber security is not created by the container shell. Agree who owns network hardening, remote access, logging, patching, asset inventory, configuration backups and incident response. The module should provide controlled physical interfaces and environmental monitoring, while the wider system needs an operating model.
5. Define the Enclosure and Safety Boundaries
The enclosure should be selected around the installation and operating environment. Confirm structural support, floor loading, access doors, roof openings, cable and pipe penetrations, weather protection, corrosion system, insulation, vapor control, lighting, emergency lighting, drainage, noise and site-specific wind or seismic criteria where applicable.
Fire strategy must be agreed with the authority having jurisdiction, insurer, operator and relevant project standards. State the detection technologies, alarm interfaces, shutdown cause and effect, suppression approach if required, manual release or abort arrangements, emergency power, signage, evacuation, service access and post-event recovery plan. A suppression system inside the container is not a substitute for site-wide emergency coordination.
Specify access control, CCTV, intrusion alarms, key management and the interface to the site security system. Also plan human factors: safe maintenance clearances, lifting points for replacement equipment, emergency exits, safe isolation points, ergonomic rack access and a clear route for failed batteries, UPS modules and network equipment.
6. Plan Transport, Installation and Commissioning Before Fabrication
Determine whether the package must travel by road, sea, rail or air and define the transport configuration. Dimensions, mass, center of gravity, lifting points, forklift restrictions, sea fastening, shock limits, preservation, humidity control and removable external equipment must be known early. A custom data-center module is not automatically a freight container certified for international container transport merely because it has a container shape.
For an ISO series 1 freight-container transport basis, ISO 1496-1 covers specifications and testing for general-purpose containers, and the International Maritime Organization explains that the CSC addresses testing, approval, inspection and maintenance for most freight containers in international transport. Project-specific equipment modules can have a different certification boundary; clarify this rather than assuming a CSC plate approves the installed IT system or the final site installation.
Prepare a site-interface schedule covering foundations or deck support, anchoring, cable routes, network entries, power incomers, external cooling connections, drainage, access platforms, fire and gas signals, earthing, lightning protection and commissioning authority. Factory acceptance testing should prove the agreed package functions before shipment. Site acceptance testing should then confirm the interfaces and operating scenarios that could not be fully reproduced in the factory.
Information the Buyer Should Provide with the RFQ
- Site location, application, installation date and operating life
- Critical services, availability objective, recovery expectation and expansion plan
- Initial and final IT load, rack count, rack density and equipment heat load
- Electrical single-line diagram, supply quality, utility or generator arrangement, autonomy and earthing basis
- Ambient conditions, corrosion category, dust, salt, wind, solar load, altitude and water availability
- Cooling preference, external plant boundary, noise limit and water-treatment constraints
- Network providers, entry points, route-resilience requirements and remote-management approach
- Fire, gas, security, hazardous-area and emergency-system interfaces where applicable
- Transport route, lifting method, installation support, access restrictions and certification basis
- Required FAT, SAT, documentation, training, spares, warranty and service-response expectations
Procurement Takeaway
The right containerized data center is one whose service objectives, power, cooling, connectivity, safety and maintenance design remain credible after it reaches the actual site. TLS can configure containerized data center solutions around the project-defined electrical, mechanical and IT scope. Send the service description, load schedule, site conditions, interface drawings and testing requirements for a focused technical review before fabrication.
FAQ
Can a containerized data center be deployed outdoors?
Yes, if the enclosure, cooling and external interfaces are engineered for the local temperature, humidity, contamination, wind, rain, solar and corrosion conditions. Outdoor placement does not remove the need for foundations or supports, drainage, secure access, cable protection and service clearances.
Does N+1 power capacity guarantee service continuity?
No. It only describes a capacity relationship within a defined boundary. Review shared upstream distribution, control systems, cooling, network paths, fuel systems, cable routes and maintenance procedures to understand the real single points of failure.
Is a standard freight-container approval enough for a data-center module?
No. A transport approval or CSC plate applies to the stated container transport scope. It does not automatically approve installed IT equipment, electrical distribution, cooling, fire systems or the final installation.
What is the most important input for cooling design?
The design IT heat load and the site design conditions. Include the load growth profile, rack arrangement, permitted inlet conditions, outdoor temperature and humidity, contamination, available utilities and the location of external heat rejection equipment.
Further Reading
• ISO/IEC 22237-1:2021 — Data centre facilities and infrastructures
• ISO 1496-1:2013 — Series 1 freight containers: general-purpose containers
• IMO — International Convention for Safe Containers (CSC)
• TLS — Containerised solutions for energy data centers and offshore operations
Short Summary
An effective factory acceptance test (FAT) proves the agreed package before shipment: identity, construction, interfaces, functional performance, protective devices, alarms, documentation and outstanding actions. It does not replace site acceptance testing, transport inspection or project approvals. Start with a traceable FAT plan linked to the purchase order, approved drawings, risk controls and site operating scenarios.
The Short Answer
Plan the FAT before fabrication is complete and use it to verify the package the customer actually ordered. The test should identify the unit, approved documents and configuration; inspect workmanship; verify dimensions, interfaces and markings; test functional and protective systems; record results; and close or clearly classify every outstanding item before shipment. The FAT is strongest when it follows the project’s real operating scenarios rather than a generic checklist.
For containerized packages, the FAT boundary can include the enclosure, structural items, electrical distribution, HVAC, controls, fire and gas interfaces, equipment skids, doors, lifting provisions and documents. It must be agreed explicitly. A successful FAT does not automatically prove final installation, transport suitability, statutory approval or operation at the customer’s site.
1. Define the Acceptance Boundary and Evidence Before Testing
Begin with the contractual scope. Freeze the documents that establish what is being accepted: purchase order, technical specification, approved general arrangement, interface drawings, electrical single-line diagram, equipment datasheets, bill of materials, control narrative, inspection and test plan, inspection records and approved deviations.
Use the FAT plan to distinguish three conditions:
- Requirements that can be physically tested in the factory
- Requirements that can be inspected or verified by document review only
- Requirements that must be verified after transport or site installation
This prevents a common problem: attempting to declare a module “fully accepted” when external utility connections, host alarms, weather exposure, foundation support, communications and operating loads do not exist in the factory.
Every test should state the precondition, test method, expected result, record, witness requirement, acceptance criterion and action if it fails. Where a simulated signal or temporary test supply is used, mark it clearly so it is not mistaken for the final site condition.
2. Confirm the Physical Package Matches the Approved Design
Verify the equipment identity, serial numbers where applicable, dimensions, mass basis, center-of-gravity marking if required, door configuration, access openings, cable and pipe entries, external interfaces, labels, coating, internal fixtures, lighting, drainage and enclosure sealing. Compare these with the latest approved drawings, not superseded sketches.
Structural and handling features require special attention. Confirm the intended lifting points, rated markings, lifting-set scope, forklift restrictions, tie-down or sea-fastening points, transport configuration and any removable items. Do not assume that corner castings or an enclosure shape establish transport approval. For freight containers used in international transport, the CSC framework covers specific testing, approval, inspection and maintenance provisions; a custom equipment package can have a different approved handling and certification basis.
Check maintainability while access is available in the factory. Open doors and panels, remove designated covers where practical, and verify access to filters, batteries, pumps, valves, control panels, service points and replaceable components. A FAT is the cheapest time to identify a blocked maintenance route or an unsafe working position.
3. Test Systems Through Realistic Operating Scenarios
The strongest FAT follows the way the package will be used. Prepare operating cases such as energization, startup, normal operation, local and remote control, loss of normal supply, emergency stop, shutdown, restart, alarm response, maintenance isolation and recovery after a component fault.
For electrical systems, confirm supply characteristics, protective-device settings, phase identification, continuity, insulation testing as applicable, functional operation of breakers and interlocks, emergency stops, UPS or battery functions where included, lighting, sockets, earthing and alarm indications. Verify that drawings, terminal labels and field devices agree.
For HVAC and ventilation, test fan rotation, airflow indication where supplied, temperature control, dampers, alarms, heaters or cooling equipment, condensation management, door interlocks and any shutdown signal. Do not claim a site-temperature performance guarantee from a brief factory run unless the agreed test conditions reproduce that duty.
For controls and automation, test each input and output in the cause-and-effect matrix. Demonstrate local controls, remote commands, permissives, alarm priority, time delays, fail-safe states, communications and manual fallback. A well-recorded input/output check is more valuable than a demonstration that only shows the system starting once.
For fire, gas, leak or other protective systems, follow the agreed safety procedure and manufacturer instructions. Demonstrate detection, alarm, shutdown and interface signals only within safe and authorized test limits. Record any functions that require final-site testing because their release, suppression, alarm or emergency-system interface cannot be fully energized in the factory.
4. Inspect Workmanship, Documentation and Configuration Control
The FAT should inspect more than performance. Check weld and fabrication records where required, coating condition, corrosion protection, penetrations, cable management, gland installation, pipe supports, insulation, guards, signage, nameplates, warning labels, housekeeping and protection of sharp edges or hot surfaces.
Review the documentation pack before shipment. It may include approved drawings, data sheets, manuals, certificates, inspection reports, material records, electrical test results, software and parameter backups, calibration certificates, spare-parts lists, packing list, preservation instructions, transport instructions, lifting information, maintenance schedule and as-built deviations.
Configuration control is essential. Record the software and firmware versions, control parameters, setpoints, password-transfer process, installed device identities and any temporary test links that must be removed. Otherwise the unit that leaves the factory may not be the configuration that passed the FAT.
5. Manage Non-Conformities Without Hiding Risk
Use a punch-list process that identifies the item, requirement, impact, responsible party, corrective action, evidence required and target closure date. Classify items by their effect on safety, performance, documentation and shipment readiness.
Do not allow a list of minor-looking open points to obscure a serious interface or safety issue. Examples of shipment blockers can include an inoperative emergency stop, missing protective-device test evidence, unverified lifting arrangement, incorrect equipment configuration, a failed leak test, inaccessible maintenance isolation, or a fire-and-gas signal that has no agreed final verification route.
If the customer accepts an item for closure after shipment, record the exact limitation and the site test or inspection that will resolve it. The goal is transparency, not a perfect-looking report.
6. Link FAT to Transport and Site Acceptance Testing
Prepare the unit for shipment only after the FAT configuration is preserved. Record loose items, removed external equipment, transport braces, door locks, preservation, desiccants, fluid levels, battery isolation, protected interfaces, packing, lifting instructions and required arrival inspection.
Site acceptance testing (SAT) should take the FAT records as its starting point. It verifies damage-free arrival and the final interfaces: foundations or deck support, site power, earthing, utilities, external pipework, network communications, remote alarms, host fire and gas connections, environmental performance, noise and operator procedures.
The handover should explicitly state what the FAT proved, what SAT must prove, what remains open and who owns each action. That boundary protects both the buyer and supplier from using a factory test as evidence for an untested site condition.
Information the Buyer Should Provide with the RFQ
- Approved technical specification, drawings, interface list and applicable standards or client requirements
- Required FAT attendance, witness points, notice period, language, location and report format
- Required functional scenarios, performance limits, alarm philosophy and cause-and-effect matrix
- Electrical, HVAC, control, fire-and-gas, security and utility tests required at the factory
- Required inspection records, certificates, calibration evidence, software backups and as-built documents
- Transport configuration, lifting and preservation requirements and arrival-inspection expectations
- Site conditions and interfaces that must be transferred to SAT
- Punch-list classification, shipment-release authority and closure process
Procurement Takeaway
A FAT is a decision-quality record, not a showroom demonstration. It should prove that the manufactured package matches the agreed design and behaves correctly in the factory-testable operating scenarios, while making every site-dependent verification visible. TLS develops custom containerised solutions with structural, electrical, HVAC and controls interfaces coordinated around the project scope. Send the test requirements, drawings, cause-and-effect logic, witness plan and site-interface list to build a focused FAT and SAT sequence.
FAQ
What is the difference between FAT and SAT?
FAT verifies the package at the factory before shipment. SAT verifies the delivered package after installation and connection to the real site systems. FAT reduces site risk; SAT confirms the conditions that cannot be fully tested in the factory.
Should the customer attend the FAT?
Attendance depends on the project’s risk and contract. Even when the customer does not attend, the FAT plan, records, photographs where appropriate, deviations and signed report should provide traceable evidence. Critical witness points should be agreed before fabrication is complete.
Can a FAT prove transport or offshore suitability?
Only if the test scope specifically covers a defined handling or transport requirement and the relevant approval basis. A functional factory test alone does not prove a package is suitable for every road, marine or offshore lift or installation.
What should block shipment after a FAT?
Any unresolved issue that affects safety, required performance, legal or contractual compliance, transport readiness, protective functions or the ability to commission the package as agreed should be resolved or formally dispositioned by the authorized parties before shipment.
Further Reading
• IMO — International Convention for Safe Containers (CSC)
• ISO 1161:2016 — Freight-container corner and intermediate fittings
• ISO 10855-1:2024 — Offshore containers and associated lifting sets
• TLS — Factory Acceptance Test for a pressurised offshore container